COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF LIGHTENING PEEL VERSUS IPL FOR TREATMENT OF EPIDERMAL MELASMA

Main Article Content

Dr Mahnoor Farooq
Dr. Ali Amar
Dr Muhammad Asfand Yar Khan
Dr Shams Ul Haq
Dr Aleena Nasir Khan
Dr Anees ur Rahman

Abstract

Background: Epidermal melasma remains a therapeutic challenge, with limited real-world data comparing Lightening Peel and IPL.


Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Lightening Peel (glycolic acid 30%) versus Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) in cases of epidermal melasma.


Methods: Prospective observational cohort study conducted at the Dermatology Department of CMH Abbottabad, involving 80 patients with epidermal melasma (diagnosed using Wood's lamp). Patients were treated either with Lightening Peel (n=40) or Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) therapy (n=40). Outcomes measured included reduction in MASI score, adverse events, and patient satisfaction at 6 months.


Results: Lightening Peel had greater reduction of MASI score (42% vs. 28%, p=0.003), fewer PIH occurrences (5% vs. 18%, p=0.02), and greater rates of satisfaction (78% vs. 55%, p=0.01) compared to IPL.


Conclusion: In clinical practice, Lightening Peel might be more effective and better tolerated in epidermal melasma than IPL.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF LIGHTENING PEEL VERSUS IPL FOR TREATMENT OF EPIDERMAL MELASMA. (2025). The Research of Medical Science Review, 3(7), 1875-1880. https://www.medscireview.net/index.php/Journal/article/view/1802